News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on TypeScript at Slack. Parent comment

Re:TypeScript at Slack by charlieflowers on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @01:29AM (#14095017)
Dunno, but I hope not. We built a moderate-sized TS codebase with _no objects at all_. Just functions and data types. Roughly functional ... with the caveat that nothing was preventing us from mutating incoming params (though our intent was not to do so).

I'd like to hope many people are using TS in a functional style.

EDIT -- there was one object ... we had to create an exception class for some reason ... don't fully recall the details.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:TypeScript at Slack by crooked-v on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @12:37PM (#14099310)
It's a bit wordy, but I think you can do something like:

    function test ({param1, param2}: {readonly param1: string, readonly param2: number}) {
        return
    }
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:TypeScript at Slack by robpalmer on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @03:07AM (#14095446)
A codebase with no objects... I am guessing you mean no classes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:TypeScript at Slack by Stoids on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @12:26PM (#14099208)
Seeing how functions are objects in JavaScript and all...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:TypeScript at Slack by charlieflowers on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @08:34PM (#14103028)
:rollseyes:
[ Parent | on HN ]