Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by ricardobeat on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @09:31PM
(#14094073)
The base Synology NAS models fit the bill - everything from blogs to office software is available from the get go. I own one but don't use them and haven't met anyone who does - there is something about hosting this on a box in your living room that feels too fragile.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by jurie on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @09:53PM
(#14094135)
QNAP NAS models have a similar setup. In addition to their own package format (qpg? I think...), they also are getting the ability to run Docker apps natively.
I agree RE the fragility. Even on my mid-range rack mount units, I'd rather stick to just having them serve up iSCSI or NFS to something more... server like that runs the actual instances.
Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by ValentineC on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @01:08PM
(#14099612)
> The base Synology NAS models fit the bill - everything from blogs to office software is available from the get go.
Their package system (for 3rd parties) seems to still be a mess: https://github.com/SynoCommunity/spksrc/issues/2216
Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by ricardobeat on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @03:05PM
(#14100752)
To be fair packaging is a bit of a mess everywhere. We're talking about installing and running things, not publishing them, I can say I was positively surprised by how well everything works in their system.