News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IndieHackers.com acquired by Stripe by sanswork on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @03:37PM (#14091642)
You make it sound like he's murdering people to get ahead not that he is targeting a social network with content that is generally relevant and popular. The anything in this case is focused promotion.
Re:IndieHackers.com acquired by Stripe by throwaway88744 on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @05:01PM (#14092408)
> You make it sound like he's murdering people

You are putting words into my mouth.

He clearly wrote:

> I've made a ton of submissions in the past 8 months and experimented with various combinations of stories/titles that the HN audience might like, without always being successful. (Probably one out of every 4-5 submissions turned into an angry mob haha)

20%-25% of his submissions made readers angry.

Nevertheless he kept going and tried, by his own admission, to micro-optimise his submissions to get visibility.

Maybe my sense of ethics is different than yours, but please don't put words in my mouth.

Re:IndieHackers.com acquired by Stripe by sanswork on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @06:23PM (#14093068)
Given the number of posts on HN these days that seem to spur a mob of angry people I'm not even sure 20-25% is a bad figure.

You said he's willing to do anything when what you meant was he is willing to work on optimising his work to better appeal to a specific target community. How does that negatively impact there community exactly?

My sense of ethics precludes me from creating a temp account to mask my own identity while attacking someone else online so I guess you're right that our ethics differ.

Re:IndieHackers.com acquired by Stripe by holtalanm on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @05:25PM (#14092601)
so by your logic he should not do whatever he can to create the most effective submission possible?

That seems counter-intuitive since really all HN cares about in the end is quality content.

Re:IndieHackers.com acquired by Stripe by minimaxir on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @05:35PM (#14092692)
> so by your logic he should not do whatever he can to create the most effective submission possible?

Ideally without breaking the HN rules.