Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by spectistcles on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @10:58AM
(#14088434)
It seems kind of funny that an open source project can't find an open source form of communication.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by cyphar on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @11:27AM
(#14088809)
Matrix is distributed chat system that is free software and people really should be switching to rather than everyone moving to Slack.
Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by coldpie on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @11:09AM
(#14088568)
IRC and mailing lists have worked for 20? 30? years and continue to work today.
Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by Pxtl on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @11:39AM
(#14088991)
Well, then we can all turn off our computers and go home, because something that "works" is obviously good enough and the entire software industry doesn't need to exist anymore. Most things we have today "work" but we're still improving on them because "good enough" isn't good enough.
Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by coldpie on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @11:46AM
(#14089107)
The question you're not asking is whether your replacement is better than the existing solutions. Slack isn't. It's closed source, proprietary, and tied to a third party's servers. I'm not going to tie my projects or company to that kind of anchor.
Re:Why Slack is inappropriate for open source communications
by Pxtl on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @12:12PM
(#14089476)
Absolutely. I completely agree that Slack brings too many problems to the table to be a replacement for IRC+Mailing lists.
I'm just saying that IRC+Mailing lists aren't good enough.