News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Great Barrier Reef at 'terminal stage' by jsperson on Monday April 10, 2017 @08:39AM (#14077966)
Offensive!? You're of course free to get offended, but pointing out that flying pollutes a lot relative to the proposed limits is certainly valid.

I think the point is that there is an opportunity to take personal responsibility here. Why wait for government? Using a couple of your examples, buying less stuff made in China would go a long way.

Re:Great Barrier Reef at 'terminal stage' by hobs on Monday April 10, 2017 @10:05AM (#14078574)
Because collective action is the only way to make a dent in multinational corporations that poison the environment?

While changing the agreement and raising awareness is good, its basically rearranging the deck chairs on the titantic.

Do you know how many "upright citizens" I know who dont shop at wallmart? All my friends, family, and people I work with. And how's wallmart doing economically right now?

Even a decently large group of citizens taking action has minimal impact on the global scale.

Either convince the governments of the world or expect the slide to continue at an ever increasing pace.

Re:Great Barrier Reef at 'terminal stage' by lhopki01 on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @05:15AM (#14086055)
Do you accept that even if governments do take action every person will still need to live within a carbon allowance or else global warming will still happen? If so even if you convince governments you'll still have to fly less and live in smaller houses and eat more locally sourced food.
[dead]
Re:Great Barrier Reef at 'terminal stage' by sctb on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @03:26PM (#14091541)
Please stop violating the guidelines. We've already asked you not to comment uncivilly or spark flamewars.