Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition
by temac on Sunday April 09, 2017 @10:37PM
(#14075608)
Yes, I saw you were talking about the subsystem, but I think this is highly related to the whole picture. The OS/2 subsystem in released NT was neither a critical component, nor was it actually interesting for MS that it became too good. However, it was possible at all, for a lot of reasons, because NT was originally intended to be NT OS/2.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.