News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition by 52-6F-62 on Sunday April 09, 2017 @05:54PM (#14074551)
I see what you're saying, and it certainly is a cul-de-sac...

but what if it is a surface layer built out of those languages and frameworks? Even if it's not optimized and technologically eloquent, it's already being rammed through now with libraries like Google's A-Frame.

Myopic maybe, but only from a select perspective. Those languages have been the most democratizing in CS history. They're the ones a lot of people seem to be the least intimidated by, at least at the outset.

I'm sure it will come back down to lower-level work because the higher level processes will soon require it. That said, I don't personally foresee some new, young group yet writing a viable alternative to Windows, macOS, Linux or any variants thereof. There's little point, and the battle would be a hard one to win. It's much easier to tame new ground in order to make one's place. That aspect shouldn't be underestimated in its influence.

Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition by JdeBP on Monday April 10, 2017 @01:00AM (#14076156)
> Those languages have been the most democratizing in CS history.

People who lived through the home computer revolution would probably suggest BASIC for that title.

Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition by 52-6F-62 on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @11:22AM (#14148348)
I'm too young to comment properly (sadly, only just). Though I'll admit that was the first language I learned in high school outside the Turing learning language.