Re:The Two Types of Knowledge: The Max Planck/Chauffeur Test...
by kbenson on Saturday April 08, 2017 @05:22PM
(#14069108)
I have an adjacent problem. I'm always worried I'm coming across more forceful and authoritative than I mean, so I sometimes feel compelled to follow statements or short conversations with "at least, that's what I think/assume is going on, or is the only thing that makes sense to me" to make sure people are aware they are getting my opinion or educated guess. I like to pontificate and work through solutions out loud with the person asking (a habit that runs in my family) when a question is asked that I don't know the answer to, and I suspect my thoughts in verbal form may be taken as assertions of fact when that's not the purpose.
But on the other hand, trying to limit yourself to only talk about things you know for sure is impossible. It's often a journey from expressing an opinion (that you might believe is a fact) to being corrected by peers and reevaluating your model. As long as I have to energy to adjust my model when someone points out the shortcomings, I feel like I am doing okay.
(This is why I like HN, i feel like I am at the bottom of the barrel and I can learn from people who are much more knowledgeable than me. I'd rather be a fool among smart people than smart among fools.)