...It's an insignificant risk that a reasonable person renting their home under AirBnB contract should neither expect, nor tolerate. As to the rest, I've talked about the other reasonable concerns a homeowner might have in other parts of this thread.

Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense. If the risk is insignificant then of course the owner should tolerate it. All the stuff about STIs is transparently just a post-hoc rationalization of people's disapproval of prostitution.

I specifically am for legalization of prostitution.

So... time to rethink your position; I'd be absolutely furious in this guy's position, and "The risk is incredibly low," would frankly piss me off even more. Your argument is about as weak as someone smoking a ton of pot in someone's house, then bitching about prohibition. I'm against prohibition, and also against you stinking up my house.

If you try to pigeonhole all of the people you disagree with, you will turn into a caricature no less absurd than the ones you're trying to create.

But you wouldn't be furious because you were worried about getting HIV or Hep C from handling a used condom. If you want to be furious for some other reason, fine.

Plenty of people who think that prostitution should be legal still disapprove of it, by the way.

I truly don't care; the notion that somehow fucking someone makes you a bad person, while fucking an economy or a nation doesn't, never sat well with me.

Sure, I just don't understand why you're insisting on this point about STIs. Disposing of a used condom with gloves is a zero risk activity. Without gloves the risk is still too low to be quantifiable.