News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by philliphaydon on Thursday April 06, 2017 @09:30PM (#14056317)
What ToS did he break? Because as far I know he broke none. He did however call out that actress who has a twitter account full of racist tweets which do violate the ToS and her account is still active and actively posting racist tweets.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by openasocket on Thursday April 06, 2017 @09:39PM (#14056363)
You talking about Leslie Jones? He photo-shopped some images to look like screen grabs of Leslie Jones saying racist things. Can you link to a racist tweet she has actually posted?

And the TOS term he broke was actively inciting others to personally harass Leslie Jones.

Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by filoleg on Thursday April 06, 2017 @10:03PM (#14056492)
>Can you link to a racist tweet she has actually posted?

Here you go, the list is not comprehensive:

https://twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/463074782205190144 https://twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/440339119239991296 https://twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/504060745026637825 https://twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/169001733417213952

As for inciting others to personally harass someone, Leslie Jones herself is very guilty of that, even moreso than Milo. Nowhere did Milo say (as far as I remember) something like "go and harass her", while she did exactly that to someone https://twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/755218642674020352

EDIT: I don't understand the downvotes, can someone explain why? Those are links directly to her twitter, primary source. Nothing is made up by me. Just because it goes against your opinion?

Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by AOsborn on Thursday April 06, 2017 @11:11PM (#14056794)
Yes, that is likely the reason for the downvotes.

For reference, source text from https://twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/755218642674020352

"Replying to @PetriJonathan @whitebecky1776 bitch I want to tell you about your self but I'm gonna let everybody else do it I'm gonna retweet your hate!! Get her!!"

Inarguably inciting harassment.

The last couple of years have been a disaster in terms of brigading and willful ignorance of evidence that does not fit the narrative of the commentator. Rational views are easily drowned out online, becoming a signal vs noise issue.

I see this on a daily basis, on all aspects of the politial spectrum. Bigger issue than fake news in my opinion.

Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by odbol_ on Friday April 07, 2017 @03:44AM (#14057885)
How are those tweets racist? She is pointing out that slavery condoned rape. That's not racist, it's called history.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by leereeves on Friday April 07, 2017 @08:18AM (#14059006)
These seem pretty racist:

> get the fuck outta here a white boy is best dj wtf?

> wait a minute is solomon sitting by a white women…#imgonnafuckhimup

Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by odonnellryan on Friday April 07, 2017 @10:11AM (#14059748)
Are you actually threatened by these comments?
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by filoleg on Friday April 07, 2017 @11:44AM (#14060619)
Being threatened is not a qualifier for being racist. You can definitely be extremely racist without threatening anyone.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by odonnellryan on Friday April 07, 2017 @11:54AM (#14060716)
I just feel that, like all things, there's a context around racism.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by leereeves on Friday April 07, 2017 @10:13AM (#14059761)
Solomon might be.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by warlox on Thursday April 06, 2017 @09:38PM (#14056355)
The rule against harassment.

https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311

> actively posting racist tweets.

[Citation Needed]