News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by dpark on Thursday April 06, 2017 @08:05PM (#14055874)
I don't see that defending the right to free/unpopular/hate speech is the same as providing a platform for it.

A grocery store owner might not want anyone to stand in their store screaming epithets about black people, or ranting about Trump, or Clinton, or whatever. That doesn't mean the store owner believes these things should be blocked, just that they should be done somewhere else.

Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ... by maxlybbert on Friday April 07, 2017 @08:47AM (#14059169)
Incidentally, California state law allows people to collect signatures and get their message out (as long as they don't disturb the peace) in any public place, and includes grocery stores in "public place."

I remember seeing people collecting signatures at the mall when I was a teenager. The mall always posted a professionally printed sign saying, essentially, "these people have a right to do this, but we don't agree with them and we ask you to ignore them."