News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An off-grid social network by cryptarch on Thursday April 06, 2017 @11:06AM (#14051160)
A Raspberry Pi is very low-powered though, it's completely insignificant compared to the power used by the webservices you use daily.
Re:An off-grid social network by reitanqild on Thursday April 06, 2017 @12:17PM (#14051937)
If the power consumption of a RPi for each household with someone like us is a major thing then I say we have come pretty far in reducing waste of energy. :-)
Re:An off-grid social network by cookiecaper on Thursday April 06, 2017 @06:14PM (#14055163)
People don't want another thing to plug in even if it's low-power. IoT is still nascent and I already don't have enough outlets in my house...
Re:An off-grid social network by lolc on Thursday April 06, 2017 @11:31AM (#14051456)
I disagree. Google uses 1/4GW worldwide and that's less than a watt per user.
Re:An off-grid social network by Zaak on Thursday April 06, 2017 @02:05PM (#14052954)
Where does that number come from?

One data center * 24 backup generators * 3 MW each = 72 MW per data center. Four of those = 288 MW > 1/4GW.

Google has more than three data centers.

Re:An off-grid social network by lolc on Sunday April 09, 2017 @07:34AM (#14071766)
Ah yes, that number is from 2011, published by Google. Can't find the original. But it was widely reported[1].

Assuming that they're doubling energy consumption every year they'd have reached 8GW in 2016. That's 8W per user if we assume 1 billion users. Energy usage of a Raspberry is not insignificant relative to even this.

Doing things at scale is vastly more efficient. And only a subset of Google services can be relegated to a Raspberry. Even if you host your own mails, are you ready to ditch the Google search index and Youtube?

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/technology/google-details-...