News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuclear plant shutdowns tied to coal pollution, decreased... by vidarh on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @07:44AM (#14041343)
Large proportions of coal plants spew uranium particles into the atmosphere. That's the radioactivity I worry about.

> Also, I'm always fascinated of the "Chernobyl was unsafe, today reactors are safe" argument. The exact same line was fed to us when Chernobyl was state of the art.

And yet the death toll of Chernobyl turned out to be a tiny fraction of what was feared, and a blib compared to the death tolls from coal and other types.

Two of the reactors kept being operated for years. That's how small of a problem it turned out to be.

> There are good reasons to think that it may indeed be so this time. But the nuclear industry has lost all trust and all right to demand anyone ever trusted them again.

On the contrary they have demonstrated that the plants are safe enough that even in face of utter incompetency and criminal levels of negligence, nuclear disasters are manageable.

Unlike, say, collapsing damns, or coal plants that kill during normal operation.

Re:Nuclear plant shutdowns tied to coal pollution, decreased... by nnq on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @08:11AM (#14041465)
> collapsing damns [...] kill during normal operation

Thank god I don't live anywhere near a dam designed to collapse as part of normal operation.

Re:Nuclear plant shutdowns tied to coal pollution, decreased... by vidarh on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @09:25AM (#14041886)
The "during normal operation" referred to the coal plants, which should be pretty obvious.
Re:Nuclear plant shutdowns tied to coal pollution, decreased... by mpweiher on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @11:13AM (#14042678)
Obvious from the correctly set commas.