News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters. Parent comment

Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by adrianN on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @08:36AM (#14031869)
I don't see the bug there. Maybe you mean that the cat simulation is not accurate enough: cat's wouldn't walk through puddles if they could avoid it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by StavrosK on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @10:51AM (#14033218)
I think the bug was that it counted as "one mug of alcohol" on the floor, and the entire thing stuck to their fur, which wouldn't happen in real life.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by Tyr42 on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @10:42AM (#14033110)
One lick of alcohol soaked fur was the same amount of alcohol as a full tankard of beer. There was only one "unit" of alcohol. Hence dead cats.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by pbtflakes on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @08:47AM (#14031956)
Unintended behavior would be more accurate.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by adamrezich on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @10:55AM (#14033272)
Maybe you don't realize just how much dwarves drink :v
[ Parent | on HN ]