News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by problems on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @12:28AM (#14029483)
No one plays CoD for the single player. Spectacle isn't the focus, multiplayer is.

The whole genre of linear single player FPSes is sort of dead. Lots of mixed genre games that tie in RPG elements with big open worlds and character customization though that are doing quite well and could benefit from better AI.

Even with a friend though we can't reliably beat the top level AI in Ghost Recon Wildlands so it can't be that bad.

Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by Matthias247 on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @07:02AM (#14031330)
I play CoD exclusively for single player :)

I personally like the interactive movie feeling, the scripted events and the scenes. I did never enjoy CoD in multiplayer which I find too hectic. The battlefield series with a more slow-paced and strategic gameplay suited me better in multiplayer. However I generally don't enjoy competing in MP that much anymore - too little time and interest to train enough to be competitive with the younger players.

Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by jakebasile on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @10:27AM (#14032932)
I play CoD mostly for single player, but not really by choice. The multiplayer population on PC dies so quickly there's not much point to it. I'm also pretty terrible at it.

Linear single player FPS is definitely not dead, although multiplayer is the current focus. As a quick example, DOOM (2016) has both linear single player and multiplayer sides, but the single player side was much better received.

Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by EliRivers on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @07:10AM (#14031364)
I, like others here, also play these games exclusively in single player mode.

I suspect that there's an element of self-selection going on here; there are lots of people who play the single player, but an onliner can't see them because when that onliner goes online it's 100% people who go online that one sees there.

There could be ten times that many playing it for the single player and they'd remain completely invisible.

Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by ionised on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @11:44AM (#14042928)
> No one plays CoD for the single player.

I did, when I actually bothered to play CoD (the first Modern Warfare was probably the last one I enjoyed) and couldn't stand the multiplayer.

When I had been used to games like Quake, Unreal and Battlefield the multiplayer in CoD always seemed so half-baked.

Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by the_af on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @10:14AM (#14032782)
I play all FPSes, CoD including, exclusively for single-player. In fact, if they were MP-only (or had weak SP) I wouldn't buy them at all. What attracts me to CoD is definitely the spectacle; the feeling of being in a Hollywood war movie.

The genre seems well and thriving.

Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by rosege on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @02:40AM (#14030091)
I love FPS but hate multiplayer. Firstly, my ping sucks so I get killed very easily. Second, I dont play that much so get killed by the kids who are playing all day. Hence I rarely play multiplayer if I can avoid it.
Re:Why F.E.A.R.’s AI is still the best in first-person shooters by elastic_church on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @02:50AM (#14030126)
yes blame the ping