Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon...
by jgalt212 on Monday April 03, 2017 @06:12PM
(#14027693)
Amen, brother. I guarantee you if some brilliant guy thinks he's worth $100MM and you refuse to pay it and he walks there will be a very long line of equally brilliant folks who will settle for $10MM.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon...
by dangero on Monday April 03, 2017 @06:57PM
(#14028022)
Google cannot afford to lose time. It's in a technology race. I'm not saying this guy was worth it, but it's not impossible to imagine how they make decisions like that. Time is much more valuable to them than money.
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon...
by M_Grey on Monday April 03, 2017 @07:26PM
(#14028203)
I'm not saying it applies here, but it's the core of many cons that you apply time pressure on the mark. "You can make all of this money, but only if you act NOW! Everyone else is doing it, they're smart and successful and YOU want to be smart and successful! I'm not asking for more than you can afford to spend, and I'm offering so much more in return! BUT ONLY IF YOU ACT NOW!"
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon...
by srtjstjsj on Monday April 03, 2017 @11:43PM
(#14029304)
When you pay people $100million for the grand accomplishment of sweet-talking the CEO, you get... Google+.
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon...
by jgalt212 on Monday April 03, 2017 @10:09PM
(#14028984)
What race are they losing? Google search/ads is a monopoly or duopoly. You don't need to pay execs $100MM to maintain this--just need to keep the DOJ off your back. The rest (self-driving cars, et al) is money losing window dressing.