A blog post leads to doubts about Cornell’s food laboratory

Re:A blog post leads to doubts about Cornell’s food laboratory by apathy on Sunday April 02, 2017 @09:48PM (#14020111)

I love how you believe that most reviewers have time to conduct a thorough review for a journal, most of the time.

As opposed to something much closer to "LGTM!" With some "but be sure to cite my vaguely-relevant work in Foo et al, 1952".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A blog post leads to doubts about Cornell’s food laboratory by lutusp on Monday April 03, 2017 @12:18PM (#14024083)

> I love how you believe that most reviewers have time to conduct a thorough review for a journal, most of the time.

Your objection is to a position I never took -- in fact I suggested the opposite. The depth of a review is gauged by its length, not its accuracy or objectivity.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A blog post leads to doubts about Cornell’s food laboratory by apathy on Monday April 03, 2017 @07:56PM (#14028351)

Ah, OK. I think we are on the same page. My mistake.

[ Parent | on HN ]