Re:Open Source Needs FPGAs; FPGAs Need an On-Ramp
by vvanders on Saturday April 01, 2017 @12:30AM
(#14010432)
Cheapest Stratix V I can find on digikey starts at ~$1,800 and quickly goes up to $10k for the bare chip in quantities of 24.
For open source hardware I doubt you'll see people shell out the cost of a used car to be able to match modern ~$200 GPUs.
I don't even what to know what Stratix 10 starts at.
Re:Open Source Needs FPGAs; FPGAs Need an On-Ramp
by thesz on Saturday April 01, 2017 @12:01PM
(#14012714)
The complete devkit solution is about $7K - https://www.altera.com/products/boards_and_kits/dev-kits/alt...
The Xeon Phi board https://www.cnet.com/products/intel-xeon-phi-coprocessor-712... is $4.2K..$5K
The Stratix V board will not consume more than 60W when used as PCI Express card. The requirements for Xeon Phi is at least 250W.
With a difference of ~200W, there will be difference in ~4.5kW/h per day or ~1600kW/h or $160 in hard cash per year (US average). Very probably more - getting rid of heat produced, etc.
Re:Open Source Needs FPGAs; FPGAs Need an On-Ramp
by throwayedidqo on Saturday April 01, 2017 @03:50AM
(#14011070)
Wow. These things just scream military use. My guess is phased array radar.
Re:Open Source Needs FPGAs; FPGAs Need an On-Ramp
by leoedin on Saturday April 01, 2017 @05:17AM
(#14011311)
I worked on a space based imaging radar which used an FPGA. It cost mid 6 figures per chip...
This was admittedly a space certified radiation hardened chip. Still alarming when you had to pick it up and carry it somewhere
You can fuse more operations into DSP using FPGA and/or you can perform less operations per FLOP. One example is to avoid rounding and packing/unpacking when creating deep pipelines for floating point processes.