News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fuchsia: a new operating system by X86BSD on Friday March 31, 2017 @05:52PM (#14008649)
Capabilities? FreeBSD, and other Unix flavors have had caps for decades.

No one uses them. Security is useless if no one uses it. Capabilities are too hard, too complex, to manage.

Great idea. Horrible implementation.

Re:Fuchsia: a new operating system by abecedarius on Friday March 31, 2017 @08:44PM (#14009646)
Unix 'capabilities' (before Capsicum, iirc) were a different thing with the same name. Confusing. Unix actually does have a different construct that is like a classical capability: an open file descriptor that you can send to another process over a Unix domain socket.
Re:Fuchsia: a new operating system by zzzcpan on Friday March 31, 2017 @06:24PM (#14008897)
FreeBSD got Capsicum only in 10.x and many projects started using them.
Re:Fuchsia: a new operating system by the_why_of_y on Saturday April 01, 2017 @07:10AM (#14011564)
One interesting thing built on top of that is CloudABI:

https://nuxi.nl/ https://www.bsdcan.org/2015/schedule/attachments/330_2015-06...

Re:Fuchsia: a new operating system by rwallace on Friday March 31, 2017 @06:26PM (#14008912)
I'm curious; do you have any details on exactly why the existing implementations are too complicated to be usable, and on whether this looks likely to be just some specific design flaws or inherent in the concept?
Re:Fuchsia: a new operating system by upboatter on Saturday April 01, 2017 @06:21AM (#14011455)
Not at the kernel level, is it?