Re:How “engagement” made the web a less engaging place
by et-al on Friday March 31, 2017 @12:49PM
(#14005620)
This was an issue when Twitter/Facebook/Instagram switched from chronological feeds to "curated" feeds. i.e. Let's increase the echo chamber.
Re:How “engagement” made the web a less engaging place
by sbardle on Friday March 31, 2017 @01:20PM
(#14005941)
Great point.
Also, I think a problem is one person can only send one like.
Returning to my example, I'd like to be able to give the litter picker 20 likes, and maybe the Selfie uploader 1 like.
I think there has to the option of another accreditation technology which runs across social networks.
It's an area I'm interested in and looking to do my next project on...
Re:How “engagement” made the web a less engaging place
by radix07 on Friday March 31, 2017 @02:06PM
(#14006364)
Then you should go to slashdot, they have been doing that for awhile...
Re:How “engagement” made the web a less engaging place
by smcnally on Friday March 31, 2017 @07:45PM
(#14009427)
Doing which? Allowing multiple likes? Cross-site accreditation?
Slashdot hands out Moderation points sometimes, and asks people to meta-moderate sometimes -- both different from Likes.
The article goes too far but there is something to be said about its core argument.
I don't think the Like button or emojis are good at recognising Value. A popular extrovert with 1000 fb friends uploads a selfie and gets 100 Likes.
Meanwhile a quiet but conscientious person uploads a before and after picture of a litter-pick they have undertaken and they get 2 Likes from their 50 friends.
There has to be a better way of recognising and incentivising the latter activity across social networks.