Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
by doctorshady on Thursday March 30, 2017 @03:48PM
(#13998340)
Just fyi, POTS is digital up until the very last mile. While the network is digital, it uses time multiplexed serial PCM streams under the hood. Aside from the delay imposed by fiber transmission at the trunk level (~40 milliseconds from one side of the US to the next. If you're using a long distance network that packetizes the connection or sends a call on some weird route, that can certainly increase), the g.711 encoding delay should be fixed at 0.125 milliseconds.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
by l1ambda on Thursday March 30, 2017 @06:04PM
(#13999305)
Interesting. I didn't know g.711 was so low. Typical VOIP latency must then stem from D/A and A/D conversion and internet latency.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered
by makomk on Thursday March 30, 2017 @06:37PM
(#13999513)
g.711 has such low latency because it doesn't take advantage of inter-sample redundancy in any way whatsoever - it's just raw 8-bit samples at 8 ksps with a compander on either end (traditionally on the analog side of the DAC and ADC).
Another problem is cell phones add ~150ms latency (pre VoLTE) and people that route calls through Google Voice adds an additional 150ms+ latency on top. If you ever talk to someone on a cell phone on google voice, it sounds like they're calling from the moon.
150ms is about the human limit before turn-taking and talking over each other becomes an annoyance. That's why cell-to-landline conversations (150ms one way) were tolerable, but cell-to-cell (300ms one way) conversations are abysmal. And that's all in the same area code. Once you add long distance, it gets worse.