News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Analyzing the monetary component of employee benefits at ... by tbrownaw on Thursday March 30, 2017 @10:35AM (#13995672)
Don't pensions tends to have issues with behind underfunded?

I'd rather not have risks just swept under the rug.

Re:Analyzing the monetary component of employee benefits at ... by ghaff on Thursday March 30, 2017 @10:48AM (#13995818)
Some people on this thread are using "pensions" (which typically refers to a defined benefit pension based on number of years of service at a company) to also mean 401-Ks (defined contribution). Pensions have become pretty uncommon in the private sector and they're largely unknown in US tech companies at this point.

401-Ks have no underfunding problem. Of course, they expose you to market risk directly.

Re:Analyzing the monetary component of employee benefits at ... by kmonsen on Thursday March 30, 2017 @10:39AM (#13995713)
No, this is your money. 401k (including matching $) is paid into an account you control. You can use it anytime, but if you do before some age (65?) there will be tax penalties.
Re:Analyzing the monetary component of employee benefits at ... by Jtsummers on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:17PM (#13996673)
59 1/2. For Traditional 401(k), you owe the taxes on it and an additional penalty if you withdraw early. You're required to take distributions from it starting at 70 (69 1/2?), because the feds want their tax dollars.

Roth 401(k) plans are less common, you'd owe a penalty but not taxes since it's pre-tax money. No mandatory distributions because they've already gotten your money.

IRAs are the same. HSAs (mentioned elsewhere) are tax-free if distributions are spent on medical costs. For non-medical costs, you owe taxes and a penalty. After age 65 you'd only owe taxes.