Re:Chase had ads on 400k sites, then on just 5k, with same r...
by rtpg on Thursday March 30, 2017 @05:48AM
(#13994045)
and now have 12000 billing portals to manage? 12000 different sites to update every time you update your ads?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chase had ads on 400k sites, then on just 5k, with same r...
by idunno246 on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:25PM
(#13996755)
actually a lot of them still use google, which can also run private deal ads.
Re:Chase had ads on 400k sites, then on just 5k, with same r...
by mozumder on Thursday March 30, 2017 @09:43AM
(#13995243)
Yes. This is how it was done during the magazine era.
Re:Chase had ads on 400k sites, then on just 5k, with same r...
by rtpg on Thursday March 30, 2017 @09:38PM
(#14000588)
Rarely. It was usually an ad agency that would do the actual deals to get things into magazines.
You could always contact a single magazine, but big corporations would let their ad agency handle distribution
Re:Chase had ads on 400k sites, then on just 5k, with same r...
by adrianN on Thursday March 30, 2017 @11:09AM
(#13996032)
Did anybody advertise in 12000 magazines?
Re:Chase had ads on 400k sites, then on just 5k, with same r...
by mozumder on Thursday March 30, 2017 @05:57PM
(#13999244)
If you include international magazines and newspapers, then yes.
Re:Chase had ads on 400k sites, then on just 5k, with same r...
by imaginenore on Thursday March 30, 2017 @09:49AM
(#13995299)
Just give them your ad code (a JS snippet), this way you control your ads.
Billing is a solved problem too, no?
Re:Chase had ads on 400k sites, then on just 5k, with same r...
by dpark on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:00PM
(#13996534)
> Billing is a solved problem too, no?
No. Billing is a huge pain in the ass. Negotiating price with each site is a huge pain in the ass. Building a reliable JS snippet that works everywhere and that these sites will trust is also a huge pain in the ass. Everything about dealing with 5k sites manually is a pain in the ass, which is why ad networks exist in the first place.