News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax... by slg on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @07:58PM (#13991740)
If this system is so popular, why can't it be introduced as a proposition in California? Take the lobbyist and politicians out of the equation and it should win easily.
Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax... by MBCook on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @08:53PM (#13992004)
According to the story it's still available in California as an option for paying your state taxes, it's simply never became the default/only option. If you're in California and want to go find it and use it, it seems you can.
Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax... by tempestn on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @08:11PM (#13991830)
It was popular among people who got to try the pilot program. That doesn't necessarily mean it would be popular among the general public, especially opponents campaigning heavily against it.
Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax... by fattire on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @09:04PM (#13992065)
It doesn't necessarily mean that, but it's the strongest evidence I could possibly imagine that it would.
Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax... by tempestn on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:09AM (#13992813)
It's strong evidence, yes. And I certainly support the change. I'm just saying I don't think it would be a given just because the pilot program was popular among participants. People vote against their interests all the time when campaigned in the right way.

Edit: Also I noticed my previous comment was missing a word. Should have been, "Especially with opponents campaigning heavily against it."