Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by davedx on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @02:53PM
(#13989421)
React is pretty damn good. I don't really see the problem all these clones are trying to solve, including the latest Vue hype.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by ben_jones on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @03:01PM
(#13989502)
Going to digress a bit but I'm working on a project in Vue and while at first it seemed like a literal breath of fresh air I came to the awful conclusion that no matter what SPA framework/library you're using, if it's javascript, you gonna be using webpack + a medium size build pipeline for es2015, jade, scss, bundling, file watching, hot-reload etc. The arguments for small libraries aren't as strong anymore because the advantages of the larger ones have enough cost/benefit that you're going to be pulling them in EVENTUALLY so might as well do it from the beginning.
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by beaconstudios on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @04:02PM
(#13990032)
You don't happen to know how to get vuex working idiomatically with deeply nested data do you? I can work with it but only if I start passing around object references, which seems like a terrible idea.
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by ben_jones on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @07:07PM
(#13991447)
No clue, haven't used vuex yet :/ .
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by beaconstudios on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @07:29PM
(#13991578)
ah ok, no worries - I think it's similar to Redux largely, which unfortunately includes being severely incompatible with nested state values.
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by girvo on Thursday March 30, 2017 @10:21AM
(#13995545)
In redux I use functional lenses to create composoable getter/setter functions to handle deeply nested data safely. I do that even without redux, but it is very useful there. Take a look at the lens functions in Ramda, or safety-lens
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by beaconstudios on Thursday April 06, 2017 @05:54AM
(#14049215)
I'd never thought to use lenses for this. Thanks for the advice, that actually really helps!
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by carlosdp on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @06:10PM
(#13991098)
Yea agreed, super confused on what's wrong with React. I know the renderer is being re-worked, but that only matters for Facebook-sized projects afaik, which 99.9% are not.
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by twsted on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @03:57PM
(#13989990)
> including the latest Vue hype
I don't see anything here exceeding the hype on React...
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by xaduha on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @05:01PM
(#13990561)
> including the latest Vue hype
yeah, what's about that? AFAIK Vue isn't new and wasn't that special back then.
Re:Show HN: FuelDOM – A React-compatible virtual DOM impleme...
by IanDrake on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @06:20PM
(#13991166)
I've only previewed vue at this point so I can only say this about why it's "better": preference.
When I looked at vue2 I saw a lot of the same features as angular2 except the binding syntax looks better to my eyes and way of thinking.
When I look at jsx I go cross-eyed.
When I look at HTML, I want to "see" the view and construct it in my head. I don't want JavaScript mixed in it.
Note: I realize vue and angular bindings are essentially JavaScript in attributes, but they can (and should) be minimal and fade into the background IME.