Re:'It's easier to hack an election than eBay': confessions ...
by rdtsc on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @01:09PM
(#13988377)
> Almost Nobody has been saying they have
It is there by implication. "Russians hacked out elections". Articles and people on social media somehow always forget to insert the caveat there that there is no clear evidence vote hacking.
Notice how many people donated towards the recount in Wisconsin. That was done in large because of the implication of "hacking" as in "the vote count was hacked". And in the end Trump ended with 3 more votes and Stein with a few million in her party's pocket.
So we can say it is a strawman but I think the strawman is a strawman as well as many people believe that narrative.
It is there by implication. "Russians hacked out elections". Articles and people on social media somehow always forget to insert the caveat there that there is no clear evidence vote hacking.
Notice how many people donated towards the recount in Wisconsin. That was done in large because of the implication of "hacking" as in "the vote count was hacked". And in the end Trump ended with 3 more votes and Stein with a few million in her party's pocket.
So we can say it is a strawman but I think the strawman is a strawman as well as many people believe that narrative.