Re:A troubling idea about climate change found new evidence ...
by woodandsteel on Tuesday March 28, 2017 @09:38PM
(#13982553)
What I am asking you to do is clarify what you mean by the terms "subjectivity" and "objectivity". I am asking that because it is common for people to differ as to whether a given claim is objective or subjective, and so I would like to know how you yourself decide.
Re:A troubling idea about climate change found new evidence ...
by wtvanhest on Tuesday March 28, 2017 @09:52PM
(#13982637)
Yes, what is obviously subjective to me, may be objevtive to you. We wont know unless we look at the evidence and debate it. Why dont you start by presenting some. I have looked and looked, but I am failing to draw causality
Re:A troubling idea about climate change found new evidence ...
by Oletros on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @04:02AM
(#13984253)
> I am looking for, no, pleading with you to present... is a clear and compelling case that global warming is at least partially caused by humans
If you think that in 2017 there is no clear and compelling case that global warming is at least partially caused by humans I think you won't accept any fact about it
Re:A troubling idea about climate change found new evidence ...
by wtvanhest on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @04:12PM
(#13990129)
That is what everyone says, but no one actually presents the paper or research that convinced them. I would think that if I held a deep conviction about something I would know why I held that belief. Unless I just decided that all my friends and TV people said something is true so it must be. That would be very alarming though...
Basically, you are commenting in circles. I am looking for, no, pleading with you to present... is a clear and compelling case that global warming is at least partially caused by humans. When you or anyone else presents that evidence, I and others will apply various techniques to determine how credible that evidence is. One of those techniques I will apply is to examine subjectivity vs objectivity.