News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Impossible Java by 0x0 on Tuesday March 28, 2017 @02:38PM (#13979352)
If you change the method name you end up with code that acts differently, just imagine something that does something like this pseudocode:

if (!new Exception().getStackTrace().getSha1sum().startsWith("0000")) alert("hello decompiler")

Your comment about java and turing completeness doesn't make sense unless you want the decompiler to basically output a java implementation of a JVM?

There are no comments on this comment yet.