As a senior dev on a team of scala/haskell programmers, we see this often. Speaking over someone is not the same as being passionate. People speak over women all the time - I have been on the receiving end of it from devs fresh out of college as someone who's published papers.
2. They were talking biological imperatives. Women's ability to have children dies at ~40. If they want to have kids, they need to get on it. No one said anything about women being only mothers and men being only breadwinners.
Reading you're comments, I'm supposing you're probably the redpill type.
Please steer clear of personal attacks. This direction leads nowhere good.
If you feel like being controversial, at least do everyone the courtesy of responding to the most obvious counter arguments ahead of time. We all know what they are, and no one wants to rehash the same stuff over and over, unless we're going to hear something new.
Comments should become more civil and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. Then we avoid the downward spiral into internet hell.
If you enjoy being an ass, at least have the decency to be honest about it and own it instead of pretending that it's "passion".
Being aggressive is not being passionate. Don't confuse the two.
If you can't get your point across without being aggressive or mean, then you have no business making it.