Re:AsciiMath – An easy-to-write markup language for mathematics
by acrefoot on Sunday March 26, 2017 @07:44PM
(#13964067)
I find TeXmac's equation editor to be an even faster WYSIWIG UI than LyX's.
For example, a λ is just 'l'+tab.
Simarly, you can cycle through other symbols. For b: b->β->
Sadly, TeXmacs hasn't gotten as much love as it deserves: I find it way better than jupyter at producing notebooks/papers that involve math, interactive code, and prose.
Re:AsciiMath – An easy-to-write markup language for mathematics
by jessaustin on Monday March 27, 2017 @04:33PM
(#13971498)
TeXmacs hasn't gotten as much love as it deserves...
Ouch, no Ubuntu package since Vivid? The screenshots look OK... is this worth building from source?
Re:AsciiMath – An easy-to-write markup language for mathematics
by mhei on Monday March 27, 2017 @03:54AM
(#13965879)
LyX actually has support for math macros, or is that support just not ergonomic for you? Not certain what the best way would be to support macros in a graphical math editor.
Re:AsciiMath – An easy-to-write markup language for mathematics
by adrianratnapala on Monday March 27, 2017 @06:32AM
(#13966476)
Never noticed them.
I mean you can always use evil-red-text. But then what is the point LyX?
And yet, despite how much I like LyX, I keep using real LaTeX instead -- especially when there is complex maths. That's because the ability to create macros in maths eventually outweighs everything else readability-wise.
And I'm afraid the same logic applies to AsciiMath. Is there some equivalent to
Or am I just going to have to use somethng `bb"r"_1` for every instance? That's a lot less readable than `\vr1`.