News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LA Times and ads by eli on Saturday March 25, 2017 @08:41PM (#13958325)
It made me sad when boingboing put one of those ad boxes on the site.

I work in digital media. I get why publishers do it. But, sheesh, if you're resorting these ads that insult your audience in exchange for pennies, I think you need to reexamine your approach.

Re:LA Times and ads by greglindahl on Saturday March 25, 2017 @09:06PM (#13958419)
It's less then pennies per view. All of those trackers also pay less than pennies per view. Basically, if you have a legit business with any ability whatsoever to make decent revenue, there's no reason to have chumboxes or paying trackers on your site.
Re:LA Times and ads by anigbrowl on Saturday March 25, 2017 @10:19PM (#13958699)
Let's not beat around the bush: some publishers do that kind of thing because they are scumbags.
Re:LA Times and ads by JustSomeNobody on Sunday March 26, 2017 @10:01AM (#13960817)
Probably some exec is standing in the middle of the war room screaming at the top of his lungs that revenue is down and so people get desperate not to lose their jobs and start sticking this crap at the bottom of the page. Some money is better than no money they think.
Re:LA Times and ads by eli on Saturday March 25, 2017 @11:23PM (#13958934)
I don't really agree. I don't think that's fair.
Re:LA Times and ads by 3131s on Sunday March 26, 2017 @01:06AM (#13959274)
It's presenting your audience with misinformation, false hope, and scams. It's incredibly scummy. Those type of ads prey on people's desperation and gullibility, and there are actually people who will fall for them and waste time and money in the process.