News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Survival of the Friendliest by justinclift on Friday March 24, 2017 @02:16PM (#13950964)
Open Source Software Communities relate to this too. Possibly a fairly obvious point to many. :)

There seems to be evolutionary (fitness?) pressure, helping shape the Communities, software, their norms, etc.

* In areas without proprietary competitors, new proprietary entrants seem to be rare.

* In many areas previously dominated by proprietary software, the Open Source alternatives are now often credible if not preferred.

This evolution of increasing fitness seems to be continuing.

If Open Source Software represents the "mammals" :D of the software ecosystem, what do the walled gardens (app stores, etc) represent?

Re:Survival of the Friendliest by Radim on Friday March 24, 2017 @11:43PM (#13953988)
I don't know -- photosynthesing organisms that generate primary resources?

Which resources are then indirectly consumed by OSS (at least its "free as in beer" variant), acting as a parasite in your analogy :) The money has to ultimately come from somewhere, you know, or the music stops.

What would software devs do if all the oh-so-evil proprietary software disappeared? Exchange FOSS PRs with each other, until they die of hunger?

Re:Survival of the Friendliest by justinclift on Saturday March 25, 2017 @07:05PM (#13957987)
> I don't know -- photosynthesing organisms that generate primary resources?

Not sure. On one hand, the walled garden approach does seem to have some benefits when done well, of drawing in further resources/development.

> Indirectly consumed by OSS

Yeah, that could definitely be the case sometimes too. When OSS Communities use offerings present in these walled gardens (eg Affinity Designer, a good vector graphics app for OSX) to further what they're doing.

Not sure if parasite is correct :), but it seems reasonable there's some interplay between the produce of the walled garden(s) and the external ecosystem.

From the OSS Communities perspective, I'd kind of expect (but am not really sure) that many of the resources used in the walled garden apps come from OSS. eg things like gzip, various other libraries, perhaps graphics (etc).

And as a note, I don't personally believe all proprietary software is oh-so-evil. ;) The companies which develop software choose to act however they do, evil or not. The "evil" is in the actions of the companies, regardless of the OSS-or-not nature. That's just my understanding of things thus far anyway. :D

Re:Survival of the Friendliest by visarga on Saturday March 25, 2017 @12:57AM (#13954184)
They would make money by using open source tools to implement specific projects for companies and end users. The fact that Node and Mongo exist is of no use, if you don't know how they work together. It takes work and experience to use the open source tools at their fullest.
Re:Survival of the Friendliest by Radim on Monday March 27, 2017 @05:48AM (#13966278)
Make money from "specific projects" that are free open source software? O_o

I think you missed the part where a vital piece of the ecosystem, namely proprietary/non-free software, no longer exists.