Re:Adventures in JIT compilation: Part 1 – an interpreter
by smitherfield on Thursday March 23, 2017 @07:00PM
(#13945120)
Because then you're increasing the cognitive overhead for the reader and the time commitment overhead for the writer.
But yeah, if the author wanted to make a part 3 it might be interesting to see his implementation for something like (a simplified subset of) Java bytecode.
But yeah, if the author wanted to make a part 3 it might be interesting to see his implementation for something like (a simplified subset of) Java bytecode.