News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber is charging passengers a $10 cancellation fee even w... by valuearb on Thursday March 23, 2017 @01:04PM (#13941652)
Not really. Let's say Taxi authority requires $20,000 bond from every driver to cover potential fines. Now you have drivers who can't afford to post the bond, you've reduced supply and increased prices.

Most any regulation is going to have some effect on supply, it's why they should always pass a cost/benefit analysis before implementation.

Re:Uber is charging passengers a $10 cancellation fee even w... by galdosdi on Thursday March 23, 2017 @03:29PM (#13943311)
BALONEY. You'd have insurance companies putting up the bonds for the drivers in exchange for a very reasonable and minor fee. I had to put up a several thousand dollar bond when I became a notary public many years ago in another state (I'm no longer one) and it cost under $50 to have a bond posted by some insurance company.

You were the one who brought up bonds though. No need for that, you can enforce regulations just fine without them. Your TLC driver's license can function as a bond -- if you don't comply with rules, suspend it.

Re:Uber is charging passengers a $10 cancellation fee even w... by marcosdumay on Thursday March 23, 2017 @01:36PM (#13942007)
I meant directly regulating the supply. Some regulations are good, others are clearly bad. And telling "therefore shall only exist 2k taxis on this city" is clearly on the bad category.