Re:Ancient Romans depicted Huns as barbarians – their bones ...
by etrevino on Thursday March 23, 2017 @11:14AM
(#13940425)
I was thinking the same thing. As someone who spent a lot of his PhD time with Late Antiquity as a secondary area of specialization, I can say that an enormous amount of this is "duh". It does not uproot the commonly accepted research by any stretch.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ancient Romans depicted Huns as barbarians – their bones ...
by Erik816 on Thursday March 23, 2017 @01:04PM
(#13941665)
I'm sure most popular press articles are "duh" if you have PhD in the field or a closely related field ...
Re:Ancient Romans depicted Huns as barbarians – their bones ...
by clw8 on Thursday March 23, 2017 @10:37PM
(#13946166)
Indeed. I've spent many a Sunday at university libraries reading about history and this was interesting and largely new to me. That people with some expertise thinks it's a duh article makes me happy that I didn't just read a bunch of bullshit!