News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who shares the story, not who reports news, is what count... by ams6110 on Wednesday March 22, 2017 @11:25PM (#13937194)
Not sure it's really a matter of trust. People just like juicy, sensational stories, and stories that cater to their weaknesses. National Enquirer has been in business since long before Facebook.
Re:Who shares the story, not who reports news, is what count... by MrQuincle on Thursday March 23, 2017 @04:29AM (#13938144)
It might also be somehow that these social networks are not attractive to people in the audience who are critical of such stories.

How long do you want to spend on a site debunking stuff? That would not be much fun. Moreover, what would be the effect? Ideally, people would adjust their news filters and start to critical think for themselves. I don't think I've the right educational credentials for that. :-)

Re:Who shares the story, not who reports news, is what count... by HoppedUpMenace on Friday March 24, 2017 @02:10PM (#13950926)
Yeah I've thought about that too, people are just being entertained by all the crazy stuff on FB like they would be with National Enquirer.
Re:Who shares the story, not who reports news, is what count... by metaphorm on Thursday March 23, 2017 @11:56AM (#13940923)
except National Inquirer was a 2 minute distraction while you stood in line waiting to pay for your groceries, whereas Facebook is a life-dominating addictive habit that displaces higher quality media consumption from the lives of its users.
Re:Who shares the story, not who reports news, is what count... by dexterdog on Thursday March 23, 2017 @12:29PM (#13941272)
Some people actually buy that rag.