News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The ‘Terminator’ of startups says he’s seeing two to four wind-downs a week. Parent comment

Re:The ‘Terminator’ of startups says he’s seeing two to four... by geofft on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @02:47PM (#13924988)
Right, this line of reasoning sounds vaguely like the broken-window fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

That is, if people being fired from these miserable startups is good for the economy, wouldn't them not having worked there at all have been even better?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The ‘Terminator’ of startups says he’s seeing two to four... by TJ-14 on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @06:03PM (#13926685)
Thats true if we already had a way of knowing they would fail but we don't. Startups are how you try new ideas to find the good ones. Do having them work there and fail creates informational value.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The ‘Terminator’ of startups says he’s seeing two to four... by mathattack on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @06:37PM (#13926930)
This is exactly the point. It's very hard to know which ideas will work, and which teams are best suited for the task. The beauty of the VC model is that it starts companies on the cheap. Many companies fail, and those people can go chase either the companies that won, or new startups. It's much better than a world where you have a couple monopolies with grand strategic plans that don't actually get anything done.

The East Coast Monopoly mindset was why Xerox PARC had money to create things, but never got anything done with them.

[ Parent | on HN ]