News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub lets staff own IP developed for personal projects ... by mmalone on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @12:21PM (#13923676)
It's also interesting how infrequently this is actually enforced by employers. Outside of extreme cases (like the current waymo/uber litigation) I've never heard of it being enforced -- even when it's pretty obvious that IP was transferred (e.g., foursquare / dodgeball). I feel like it's in there because it always has been. I thought about removing it for my new business, but I'm worried about diligence issues if I end up raising more money or selling. At GitHub's scale that's less of a concern.
Re:GitHub lets staff own IP developed for personal projects ... by dangero on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @12:39PM (#13923856)
It's not just enforcement that matters though. The threat of enforcement is far more common and has come up at every company I've worked for. That ends up creating a tense environment for employees in a similar way to how a criminal feels when they've committed a crime, but have not been caught. The threat of life-altering damage is a huge stress to carry.
Re:GitHub lets staff own IP developed for personal projects ... by greglindahl on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @10:41PM (#13928103)
When IBM Watson bought Blekko we had to produce an IP assignment for 100% of the people who had ever worked on our IP. Elsewise, how would IBM know that they were actually buying something?