Re:Man jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt hard driv...
by craftkiller on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @01:45AM
(#13920121)
Wow, that's a lot against this guy, but hypothetically couldn't compelling him to decrypt his drives based on a file hash set a dangerous precedent where police can just plant file hashes somewhere to get access to anyone's drives? Sort of the high tech version of the drug dogs that would signal on cue.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Man jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt hard driv...
by tedunangst on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @02:27AM
(#13920269)
They could also plant an unencrypted drive and skip the whole getting the password step.
Re:Man jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt hard driv...
by blusterXY on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @06:05AM
(#13920911)
Then they would need access to the images and not just knowledge of the hashes.
Re:Man jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt hard driv...
by taneq on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @08:03AM
(#13921424)
If they're going to ignore that pesky 'staying within the law' step they might as well just lock him up indefinitely right now.
Re:Man jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt hard driv...
by mjolk on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @12:20PM
(#13923657)
They're staying within the law -- the defendant being in violation of the law is why an order to comply was filed and why we have access to the court of appeals document.
If you don't like the process, that's a different conversation.
Re:Man jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt hard driv...
by TheRealDunkirk on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @08:52AM
(#13921696)
Eighteen months without a charge. I think they're way ahead of you. IMO, they've already abrogated his 6th-Amendment right to a speedy trial as well.