Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

Re:Why are the east of cities usually poorer? by nl on Sunday May 30, 2010 @09:20PM (#1391512)

Except in WA, where many prestigious suburbs are in the West (Peppermint Grove, etc), and Adelaide where they are distributed around the center (North Adelaide to the North, Unley Park & Springfield to the South, as well as some in the East).

I think that in Australian cities factors other than wind direction have a larger influence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why are the east of cities usually poorer? by megablast on Sunday May 30, 2010 @10:02PM (#1391576)

Adelaide is a big exception, since it is bordered on the west by the ocean, and the east by the hills. All the prestigious suburbs are around the city, with the North and South regions having the worst places. The most prestigious places are to the south and east, then north, and lastly west.

Sydney, the further west you go, the worse it gets. The population center of Sydney is actually 10km west of the city. Pretty much all the nice suburbs are either East, or North.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why are the east of cities usually poorer? by antipaganda on Sunday May 30, 2010 @11:11PM (#1391685)

That's because the West is further inland, away from the cooling ocean breeze, and gets bloody hot compared to the city.

[ Parent | on HN ]