News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Skype lies, breaks "Skype-to-Skype"calls are free promise by loyaltyspace on Sunday May 30, 2010 @01:14PM (#1390758)
What a sensationalist headline.

So what if they've introduced charges? If someone else provides this for free, go there. If not, cough up!

Re:Skype lies, breaks "Skype-to-Skype"calls are free promise by arbitraryperson on Sunday May 30, 2010 @01:30PM (#1390785)
But they gave me their word!
Re:Skype lies, breaks "Skype-to-Skype"calls are free promise by zmmmmm on Sunday May 30, 2010 @09:00PM (#1391473)
I agree, it's outrageous. I say you are entitled to a full refund!
Re:Skype lies, breaks "Skype-to-Skype"calls are free promise by OoTheNigerian on Sunday May 30, 2010 @01:58PM (#1390843)
where?
Re:Skype lies, breaks "Skype-to-Skype"calls are free promise by Frazzydee on Sunday May 30, 2010 @03:58PM (#1391011)
It still says so here: http://www.skype.com/intl/en/security/safety/safe-payments/

"Skype-to-Skype calls will always be free but there are a few things that cost a little such as calling mobiles and ordinary phones when you want to get hold of your friends that havent started using Skype yet."

Re:Skype lies, breaks "Skype-to-Skype"calls are free promise by OoTheNigerian on Monday May 31, 2010 @12:36PM (#1392883)
Ok. That's much better. When people maike claims, it is always good to put evidence. The discussion would have been different if that was put there.

But I believe charging is the only was that network operators will allow Skype to work at all. It would be good if they explained it that way.

Re:Skype lies, breaks "Skype-to-Skype"calls are free promise by freescale on Sunday May 30, 2010 @02:55PM (#1390941)
I agree the sensationalist headline. The moderators should delete this submission. Inflammatory headlines do nothing to encourage discussion.