Re:To www or not www
by lilyball on Saturday March 18, 2017 @11:55PM
(#13905082)
> If the site did not have www, most people assumed it is probably made by kids, who do not have www yet.
This doesn't make any sense to me. There's literally no correlation between "made by kids" and "doesn't have www", and no reason why anyone would ever make that association. You've provided what appears to be a bullshit justification for a completely unsubstantiated and fairly outlandish claim.
This doesn't make any sense to me. There's literally no correlation between "made by kids" and "doesn't have www", and no reason why anyone would ever make that association. You've provided what appears to be a bullshit justification for a completely unsubstantiated and fairly outlandish claim.