Re:Building a Hackintosh Pro
by derefr on Saturday March 18, 2017 @04:08PM
(#13903249)
My theory is that they strongly believe PCIe-over-Thunderbolt (now -over-USB-C) will obviate all need for internal expandibility/upgradability, and they went all-in on a form-factor (the garbage-can Mac) to take advantage of that... and then the market has stubbornly refused to co-operate by releasing Thunderbolt peripherals equivalent to internal components. So they're playing chicken with said market, probably under Intel's repeated promises to make it happen.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Building a Hackintosh Pro
by Sanddancer on Saturday March 18, 2017 @09:08PM
(#13904519)
Which won't happen until Intel is more willing to loosen their grip on Thunderbolt. With Thunderbolt, in order to even get in the door, you have to file an application to request to get into the development program which they promise to get back to you within three weeks in order to just get the datasheets needed to start designing. Conversely, protocols like PCIe and USB, you can get the chips, the datasheets, and development boards, with no signup process, just waiting a few days for the items to come in the mail. When you treat your customers like that, it's no surprise that the takeup on thunderbolt has been tepid.
Re:Building a Hackintosh Pro
by throwaway2048 on Sunday March 19, 2017 @10:07AM
(#13907144)
Not to mention you can only buy controllers from intel, and we are talking $50+ a controller, its totally insane.
Re:Building a Hackintosh Pro
by erik_seaberg on Saturday March 18, 2017 @10:36PM
(#13904830)
When my machine isn't portable, I'd much rather have my upgrades mounted inside a generously-sized case than a tiny one surrounded by a rat's nest of cables.