News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Utah Reduced Chronic Homelessness by rhizome on Friday March 17, 2017 @03:16PM (#13897066)
The only way housing would suck up the entire UBI is if everyone were trapped in a California situation where new housing was impossible.

Provided there are no location/COL adjustments.

Re:How Utah Reduced Chronic Homelessness by telchar on Friday March 17, 2017 @04:15PM (#13897583)
I think providing location/COL adjustments would be a big mistake for a UBI system. Providing a flat rate encourages people to move to lower-COL places which would reduce the amount of economic activity tied up in rent. It seems to me that adjusting for COL would just reward those who choose to prop up rents and worsen the rent <-> COL cycle.
Re:How Utah Reduced Chronic Homelessness by tracker1 on Friday March 17, 2017 @10:56PM (#13899648)
Agreed.. the main benefit to such a system would be simple rules that apply to everyone, that you can't cheat (other than potentially non-citizens getting benefits). It there's any complexity, including COL, that makes it easier to cheat said system.
Re:How Utah Reduced Chronic Homelessness by goodcanadian on Friday March 17, 2017 @05:00PM (#13897965)
Indeed, by encouraging people to move to lower cost of living areas, they may actually help prop up the local economy by spending their UBI cheques in otherwise depressed areas.