News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Insert D-Wave Post Here by coldtea on Thursday March 16, 2017 @03:25PM (#13888268)
Wait till you see the list of respected Enron and Theranos supporters...
Re:Insert D-Wave Post Here by QCman on Thursday March 16, 2017 @03:32PM (#13888349)
Do you have information not available to the organizations that have spent over $60M on D-Wave computers? Why are you wasting your time here?
Re:Insert D-Wave Post Here by coldtea on Thursday March 16, 2017 @03:41PM (#13888439)
>Why are you wasting your time here?

Because I like reading arguments from authority -- especially ones based on the premise that major organizations never buy into BS.

Which I guess explains why software sold to enterprises is known for its quality and utility.

Re:Insert D-Wave Post Here by QCman on Thursday March 16, 2017 @04:05PM (#13888659)
OK, but that doesn't explain why D-Wave has so many paying customers (Google, NASA, Lockheed Martin, Los Alamos National Labs, University of Southern California, Temporal Defense Systems, US government, CIA/In-Q-Tel).
Re:Insert D-Wave Post Here by coldtea on Thursday March 16, 2017 @04:50PM (#13889041)
Even if one insists on "argument from authority", paying customers means nothing.

Satisfied customers, now, that's a whole other thing.

Re:Insert D-Wave Post Here by fl0wenol on Thursday March 16, 2017 @07:34PM (#13890118)
Repeating that list in your response doesn't underscore your point, it instead emphasizes how little you have to add in rebuttal.