I think that's a good point, not sure why Clojuse did that. I get confused because some macro expect grouping, others don't. I think it happened as an accident, different people wrote the different core macros and decided on slightly different parsing rules.
Btw, of modern Lisp dialects, I do not like Clojure for undermining this advantage by not syntactically grouping everything that is grouped semantically (e.g. binding pairs in let) just to use less parentheses. In my opinion, Scheme syntax (Guile is a Scheme implementation) is much better.