Re:University of Tokyo Graduate School Entrance Exam – Mathe...
by schoen on Thursday March 16, 2017 @01:25PM
(#13886916)
> The difference between math and writing programs is that in math, there's no compiler.
Increasingly, there are tools so that there could be, if you want to do math that way.
Re:University of Tokyo Graduate School Entrance Exam – Mathe...
by wbl on Thursday March 16, 2017 @02:27PM
(#13887557)
You mispelled Kato. Tao is an analyst not a number theorist. As for the Italian school tge foundational issues were common to all algebraic geometers. Ultimately concepts like generic point pointed the way towards scheme theory, even if not rigorously defined.
Re:University of Tokyo Graduate School Entrance Exam – Mathe...
by doall on Thursday March 16, 2017 @07:32PM
(#13890109)
Tao definitely knows about prime numbers. Whether mathematical approach he takes, he is relevant to the field.
But the literature is not to blame for that. He simply tries to do something that nobody else has ever achieved before. Of course he's going to make mistakes.
The difference between math and writing programs is that in math, there's no compiler. When you go in the wrong direction, nobody is going to tell you about it. But this doesn't mean that any of the proven theorems that he bases his work on are faulty. He can rely on each and every one of them. They are proven to be true.
His issues stem from the fact that he wants to do things that are unexplored. Think columbus discovering america. Its not that his maps are faulty. There simply is no map for the new continent yet.
The rigor in math has nothing to do with an elitist attitude. The italians tried to do handwaving math for a hundred years. 100 years of italian algebraic geometry had to be erased because they began dropping the elitist attitude. They made progress at an amazing pace until eventually, they discovered inconsistencies in their "findings" and had to start over.