OP mentioned ethical and environmental concerns. "lovingly raised meat" might address the former if your ethical concerns are about specific livestock conditions, but not if you think raising animals for human consumption is unethical, period. And it does nothing whatsoever to address the environmental concerns, which are considerable, and are a primary motivator for many people who reduce or eliminate meat (judging from the medium post, OP included).

"lovingly raised" to be slaughtered is an oxymoron.

Not necessarily. Anyone who runs small farms or boutique cattle studs would disagree.

All animals will die at some stage. If their life up to that point was in a caring and respectful environment, and they are humanely killed, what's the problem?

We regularly sent our cattle to the abattoir, and it didn't stop them being happy cows that got hugs and shoulder scratches...

What exactly does "humanely killed" mean? Is there a method of being killed against your will that you'd be up for?

It means a swift, unexpected death. No discomfort involved.

I get it, and I find it odd that we refer to this as "humane".

Animals killed for meat die as adolescents. This is dispicable.

Exactly. One can make an extreme example and ask how they would feel about someone lovingly slaughtering their husband/wife and children.

Yeah, I think he/she meant "humanely raised"

"lovingly raised" would mean you're buying the animal still alive?