News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adblock Plus announces members of independent Acceptable ... by manigandham on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @04:20PM (#13879407)
Do you expect content producers to get paid?
Re:Adblock Plus announces members of independent Acceptable ... by COMPUTERLOSER on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @05:31PM (#13879994)
Value of random website that I click on: $0.01

Potential losses from drive-by-download or other malicious content served by an ad-network: -$30000.00

Re:Adblock Plus announces members of independent Acceptable ... by georgeott on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @04:38PM (#13879547)
Not if I have to allow untested 3rd party Javascript / malware onto my system. No thank you.
Re:Adblock Plus announces members of independent Acceptable ... by joelthelion on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @04:29PM (#13879478)
Not through ads displayed in my browser. There are other ways to get paid, though.
Re:Adblock Plus announces members of independent Acceptable ... by manigandham on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @04:36PM (#13879534)
So content displayed through browser should be behind a paywall then? What if the solution is ads blocked for a fee?
[dead]
Re:Adblock Plus announces members of independent Acceptable ... by openasocket on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @05:01PM (#13879734)
Would you prefer a paywall? Seriously asking
Re:Adblock Plus announces members of independent Acceptable ... by mlmlmasd on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @05:14PM (#13879850)
No I prefer everything to be free, open source, organic, and made by volunteers. You can stop pretending that there are only two options.
Re:Adblock Plus announces members of independent Acceptable ... by openasocket on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @06:47PM (#13880616)
Obviously there are more than two options, but I'm asking about your preference between those two. You can give me a ranking of order of preference for all the different options you can think of if you prefer, but I'm mostly interested where paywalls fall in relation to ads.