News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Online Dating Sucks for Men (2013) by projektir on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @12:44AM (#13873867)
I'm a woman and felt similar reading that response. I'd never pay much attention to a guy if he has nothing on his profile because, as you said, the interests and such are too far off the beaten track. It definitely works for a wide range of people, but really doesn't for a certain subset.

I wonder how a dating service focused on detailed profiles, later meeting, and customizable search range would do...

Re:Why Online Dating Sucks for Men (2013) by greenhatman on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @11:47AM (#13876899)
I think that's what OKCupid is focussed on and good at.
Re:Why Online Dating Sucks for Men (2013) by projektir on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @03:33PM (#13879054)
I recall OKCupid could ban you if you didn't provide a picture.
Re:Why Online Dating Sucks for Men (2013) by pmoriarty on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @04:00PM (#13879269)
Do they actually check to see if it's actually a person of you? Or could you provide, say, a picture of a fluffy bunny?
Re:Why Online Dating Sucks for Men (2013) by Lazare on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @09:00PM (#13881454)
If it's flagged, actual people will review the primary profile picture and decide whether they believe it is a picture of the account holder that meets their (quite reasonable) guidelines. Jokes, nudity, too close, too far away, obvious fakes, etc. will get your account locked.

So no, a picture of your pet rabbit will NOT work as a primary profile picture.